Lady Justice – Get Smart: Regulate AI

Share Post:

It must be a sign of maturity or anxiety, I found myself watching C-SPAN. I did not even know what C-SPAN stood for – “Cable-Satellite Public Affairs Network”. It was created in 1979 by the cable television industry as a non-profit public service in the United States. Among its offerings are the proceedings of the US federal government. To some of us, comparable to watching paint dry.

Why, you ask? Did I miss paying for my Netflix account or get annoyed at the endless commercial interruptions on the free version of YouTube? C-SPAN simply had the most existential offering of the season. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman was testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee. He was one of three artificial intelligence experts testifying as to oversight of the rapidly developing technology.

OpenAI is the company that created ChatGPT (text generating) and DALL-E (image generating) generative artificial intelligence tools. Almost anyone thinking about the evolution of AI has recently become worried about it taking over their jobs or manipulating elections through disinformation, etc.

I am reminded of Maxwell Smart in the Get Smart comedy television series created in the 1960s that parodied secret agents. His shoe phone and the always defective cone of silence equate with our modern cell phones and lack of privacy, a visionary series perhaps of how we bumble through, but, hopefully, the good guys will win.

The recommendations include that companies must undertake to do the right thing (such as being transparent, ethical and protecting our privacy), governments must regulate it, and there must be public education. When the people that know the most about AI and benefit from it agree that there must be oversight, I do not have any problem agreeing, vociferously. It might be acknowledged that we already missed the boat on internet regulation and social media regulation.

My husband’s equivalent to watching C-SPAN is watching the Supreme Court of Canada proceedings on CPAC, the Canadian Parliamentary Affairs Channel. Last week Federal Justice Minister Lametti called him and offered him a position as a Justice of the Alberta Court of King’s Bench, an opportunity to serve Albertans in a new capacity. As a lawyer, he had ultimate selection of the cases he took on. As a judge, he might soon be deciding cases about the regulation of AI tools. One thing I think nobody but the “bad guys” would dispute, we need regulation to ensure online safety of our children.

As we approach the three-year anniversary of my “new” law firm, I want to take a moment to thank the readers who voted for both my firm and me in the Best of Red Deer and we were thrilled to receive a silver award. A special shout out to all our firm members, clients, colleagues and community that have supported us as we create the law firm of the future, as we believe the future is now. Forever grateful, central Alberta is where it’s at, the heart of the entrepreneurial spirit that lives in Albertans. AI and all.

Donna Purcell, K.C., (aka Lady Justice) is a Central Alberta lawyer and Chief Innovation Officer with Donna Purcell QC Law. If you have legal questions, contact [email protected].

This article is of an informational nature only and should not be relied upon as business, legal, or other professional advice. It is not exhaustive of the possible rights or remedies available to you. Laws may change over time and the those listed above may not be up to date. This article and all materials provided are not intended to be relied upon without further consultation. Readers should consult a legal professional for specific advice in any particular situation. Please Contact Us to set up a consultation. Please see our Terms of Service for more information.

Stay Connected

More from DPQC Law

New Tort of Harassment: Alberta Health Services v Johnston

Alberta Health Service employees experienced the brunt of the anti-vaccine and anti-masking sentiments triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. Former Calgary mayoral candidate Kevin Johnston in particular was a prominent agitator against the employees of AHS not only expressing anti-vaccine and anti-masking rhetoric in-person and online, but also calling AHS employees terrorists and criminals. As a result of his treatment of AHS employees, particularly his treatment of the plaintiff Sarah Nunn, the tort of harassment has been officially recognized in Alberta. I summarize here the test for the new tort and what damages can flow from it.

Alberta Firms Make the Season Bright

As we enter the 2023-2024 holiday season, we at Law Matters would like to recognize and celebrate law firms that give back to the community. Across the province and every year, members of the legal community take numerous initiatives that serve and support the wider community. Beyond legal work, the legal community acts to improve the lives of those around them. This is particularly evident in smaller regions around Alberta, where law firms are an important part of the fabric of their communities. This year, we are spotlighting two regional firms as fine examples of the positive impact of the legal community on greater society.

Does my Employer Own my Side Project?

Employees generate some of an employer’s most valuable intellectual property (“IP”) in the course of their employment. But an enterprising employee may develop a side project or hustle that blurs the lines of ownership. In this blog, we discuss important considerations to determine ownership of a side project, including the different types of IP, contract considerations, use of employer’s resources, and how to protect a side project.